# An Empirical Study on Code Comment Completion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10544 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10544/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10620/) (2023)
- [From Commit Message Generation to History-Aware Commit Message Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07655/) (2023)
- [Automating Code-Related Tasks Through Transformers: The Impact of Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04048/) (2023)
- [Enriching Source Code with Contextual Data for Code Completion Models: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12269/) (2023)
- [Empirical Study of Code Large Language Models for Binary Security Patch Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06052/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Code comments play a prominent role in program comprehension activities. However, source code is not always documented and code and comments not always co-evolve. To deal with these issues, researchers have proposed techniques to automatically generate comments documenting a given code at hand. The most recent works in the area applied deep learning (DL) techniques to support such a task. Despite the achieved advances, the empirical evaluations of these approaches show that they are still far from a performance level that would make them valuable for developers. We tackle a simpler and related problem: Code comment completion. Instead of generating a comment for a given code from scratch, we investigate the extent to which state-of-the-art techniques can help developers in writing comments faster. We present a large-scale study in which we empirically assess how a simple n-gram model and the recently proposed Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) architecture can perform in autocompleting a code comment the developer is typing. The achieved results show the superiority of the T5 model, despite the n-gram model being a competitive solution.
