# Rethinking Trajectory Forecasting Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10297 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10297/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04838/) (2019)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07446/) (2016)
- [One Thousand and One Hours: Self-driving Motion Prediction Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14480/) (2020)
- [Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06113/) (2019)
- [Fast and Furious: Real Time End-to-End 3D Detection, Tracking and Motion Forecasting with a Single Convolutional Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12395/) (2020)
- [A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10671/) (2020)
- [Multimodal Probabilistic Model-Based Planning for Human-Robot Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09483/) (2017)
- [Collision Avoidance in Pedestrian-Rich Environments with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11689/) (2019)
- [Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08745/) (2020)
- [Identifying Driver Interactions via Conditional Behavior Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09959/) (2021)
- [MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07517/) (2020)
- [Fast Marching Tree: a Fast Marching Sampling-Based Method for Optimal Motion Planning in Many Dimensions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.3532/) (2013)
- [Risk-Sensitive Sequential Action Control with Multi-Modal Human Trajectory Forecasting for Safe Crowd-Robot Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05702/) (2020)
- [Heterogeneous-Agent Trajectory Forecasting Incorporating Class Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12446/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Neural Network Gradients within Trajectory Optimization for Proactive Human-Robot Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.01027/) (2020)
- [Survey on Vision-based Path Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00233/) (2018)
- [Zero-Shot Crowd Behavior Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05877/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.13319/) (2022)
- [Propagating State Uncertainty Through Trajectory Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03267/) (2021)
- [MTP: Multi-Hypothesis Tracking and Prediction for Reduced Error Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09481/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty estimation for Cross-dataset performance in Trajectory prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07310/) (2022)
- [Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08664/) (2025)
- [A Game-Theoretic Framework for Joint Forecasting and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06137/) (2023)
- [ManiCast: Collaborative Manipulation with Cost-Aware Human Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13258/) (2023)
- [Trends in Motion Prediction Toward Deployable and Generalizable Autonomy: A Revisit and Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09074/) (2025)
- [Probabilistic Symmetry for Multi-Agent Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01927/) (2022)
- [LMR: Lane Distance-Based Metric for Trajectory Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05869/) (2023)
- [Pedestrian motion prediction evaluation for urban autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16864/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Forecasting the behavior of other agents is an integral part of the modern robotic autonomy stack, especially in safety-critical scenarios with human-robot interaction, such as autonomous driving. In turn, there has been a significant amount of interest and research in trajectory forecasting, resulting in a wide variety of approaches. Common to all works, however, is the use of the same few accuracy-based evaluation metrics, e.g., displacement error and log-likelihood. While these metrics are informative, they are task-agnostic and predictions that are evaluated as equal can lead to vastly different outcomes, e.g., in downstream planning and decision making. In this work, we take a step back and critically evaluate current trajectory forecasting metrics, proposing task-aware metrics as a better measure of performance in systems where prediction is being deployed. We additionally present one example of such a metric, incorporating planning-awareness within existing trajectory forecasting metrics.
