# Why is Pruning at Initialization Immune to Reinitializing and Shuffling?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01808 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.01808/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03033/) (2020)
- [Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05467/) (2020)
- [Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07376/) (2020)
- [Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.08576/) (2020)
- [Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the Jackpot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11094/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06767/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies assessing the efficacy of pruning neural networks methods uncovered a surprising finding: when conducting ablation studies on existing pruning-at-initialization methods, namely SNIP, GraSP, SynFlow, and magnitude pruning, performances of these methods remain unchanged and sometimes even improve when randomly shuffling the mask positions within each layer (Layerwise Shuffling) or sampling new initial weight values (Reinit), while keeping pruning masks the same. We attempt to understand the reason behind such network immunity towards weight/mask modifications, by studying layer-wise statistics before and after randomization operations. We found that under each of the pruning-at-initialization methods, the distribution of unpruned weights changed minimally with randomization operations.
