# Optimality Inductive Biases and Agnostic Guidelines for Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01407 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.01407/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 14 of its 203 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2021.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Offline RL algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/offline-rl-algorithms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [VectorNet: Encoding HD Maps and Agent Dynamics from Vectorized Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04259/) (2020)
- [End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02410/) (2017)
- [DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00256/) (2015)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02532/) (2017)
- [Sim-to-Real via Sim-to-Sim: Data-efficient Robotic Grasping via Randomized-to-Canonical Adaptation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.07252/) (2018)
- [Using Simulation and Domain Adaptation to Improve Efficiency of Deep Robotic Grasping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07857/) (2017)
- [Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06854/) (2019)
- [SMARTS: Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Training School for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09776/) (2020)
- [IRIS: Implicit Reinforcement without Interaction at Scale for Learning Control from Offline Robot Manipulation Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05321/) (2019)
- [NeuralSim: Augmenting Differentiable Simulators with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04217/) (2020)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Grasping: A Simulated Comparative Evaluation of Off-Policy Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10264/) (2018)
- [A Fast Integrated Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous Driving via Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.02515/) (2017)
- [Learning End-to-end Autonomous Driving using Guided Auxiliary Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.10393/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of state-of-the-art offline RL methods varies widely over the spectrum of dataset qualities, ranging from far-from-optimal random data to close-to-optimal expert demonstrations. We re-implement these methods to test their reproducibility, and show that when a given method outperforms the others on one end of the spectrum, it never does on the other end. This prevents us from naming a victor across the board. We attribute the asymmetry to the amount of inductive bias injected into the agent to entice it to posit that the behavior underlying the offline dataset is optimal for the task. Our investigations confirm that careless injections of such optimality inductive biases make dominant agents subpar as soon as the offline policy is sub-optimal. To bridge this gap, we generalize importance-weighted regression methods that have proved the most versatile across the spectrum of dataset grades into a modular framework that allows for the design of methods that align with how much we know about the dataset. This modularity enables qualitatively different injections of optimality inductive biases. We show that certain orchestrations strike the right balance, improving the return on one end of the spectrum without harming it on the other end. While the formulation of guidelines for the design of an offline method reduces to aligning the amount of optimality bias to inject with what we know about the quality of the data, the design of an agnostic method for which we need not know the quality of the data beforehand is more nuanced. Only our framework allowed us to design a method that performed well across the spectrum while remaining modular if more information about the quality of the data ever becomes available.