# Polarization in Geometric Opinion Dynamics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12459 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12459/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Deep Generalized Schr"odinger Bridge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09893/) (2022)
- [Mirror Diffusion Models for Constrained and Watermarked Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01236/) (2023)
- [Generalized Schr"odinger Bridge Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02233/) (2023)
- [Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13026/) (2022)
- [Neural Lagrangian Schr"odinger Bridge: Diffusion Modeling for Population Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04853/) (2022)
- [Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01807/) (2024)
- [Decision-Dependent Stochastic Optimization: The Role of Distribution Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07324/) (2025)
- [Online Recommendations for Agents with Discounted Adaptive Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06014/) (2023)
- [Feedback Schr"odinger Bridge Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14055/) (2024)
- [Topological Schr"odinger Bridge Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04799/) (2025)
- [Deep Graphic FBSDEs for Opinion Dynamics Stochastic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02506/) (2022)
- [Online Stackelberg Optimization via Nonlinear Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18805/) (2024)
- [HOTA: Hamiltonian framework for Optimal Transport Advection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17513/) (2025)
- [Optimally Improving Cooperative Learning in a Social Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20808/) (2024)
- [Deep Generalized Schr"odinger Bridges: From Image Generation to Solving Mean-Field Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20279/) (2024)
- [Contact Wasserstein Geodesics for Non-Conservative Schr"odinger Bridges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06856/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In light of increasing recent attention to political polarization, understanding how polarization can arise poses an important theoretical question. While more classical models of opinion dynamics seem poorly equipped to study this phenomenon, a recent novel approach by Hkazla, Jin, Mossel, and Ramnarayan (HJMR) proposes a simple geometric model of opinion evolution that provably exhibits strong polarization in specialized cases. Moreover, polarization arises quite organically in their model: in each time step, each agent updates opinions according to their correlation/response with an issue drawn at random. However, their techniques do not seem to extend beyond a set of special cases they identify, which benefit from fragile symmetry or contractiveness assumptions, leaving open how general this phenomenon really is. In this paper, we further the study of polarization in related geometric models. We show that the exact form of polarization in such models is quite nuanced: even when strong polarization does not hold, it is possible for weaker notions of polarization to nonetheless attain. We provide a concrete example where weak polarization holds, but strong polarization provably fails. However, we show that strong polarization provably holds in many variants of the HJMR model, which are also robust to a wider array of distributions of random issues -- this indicates that the form of polarization introduced by HJMR is more universal than suggested by their special cases. We also show that the weaker notions connect more readily to the theory of Markov chains on general state spaces.