# Predicting cognitive scores with graph neural networks through sample selection learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09408 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09408/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02428/) (2019)
- [Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06103/) (2017)
- [SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11763/) (2019)
- [Graph Transformer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06455/) (2019)
- [Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05718/) (2020)
- [Few-Shot Learning with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04043/) (2017)
- [A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09893/) (2019)
- [Edge-labeling Graph Neural Network for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.01436/) (2019)
- [Graph Neural Networks in Network Neuroscience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03535/) (2021)
- [GMNN: Graph Markov Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06214/) (2019)
- [Understanding the Representation Power of Graph Neural Networks in Learning Graph Topology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05008/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Joint Graph Convolution for Analyzing Brain Structural and Functional Connectome](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07363/) (2022)
- [Generalizing Medical Image Representations via Quaternion Wavelet Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10224/) (2023)
- [An Explainable Geometric-Weighted Graph Attention Network for Identifying Functional Networks Associated with Gait Impairment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13108/) (2023)
- [Meta-RegGNN: Predicting Verbal and Full-Scale Intelligence Scores using Graph Neural Networks and Meta-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.13530/) (2022)
- [Manifold GCN: Diffusion-based Convolutional Neural Network for Manifold-valued Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14381/) (2024)
- [GAMMA-PD: Graph-based Analysis of Multi-Modal Motor Impairment Assessments in Parkinson's Disease](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00944/) (2024)
- [Predicting Cognition from fMRI:A Comparative Study of Graph, Transformer, and Kernel Models Across Task and Rest Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21016/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Analyzing the relation between intelligence and neural activity is of the utmost importance in understanding the working principles of the human brain in health and disease. In existing literature, functional brain connectomes have been used successfully to predict cognitive measures such as intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in both healthy and disordered cohorts using machine learning models. However, existing methods resort to flattening the brain connectome (i.e., graph) through vectorization which overlooks its topological properties. To address this limitation and inspired from the emerging graph neural networks (GNNs), we design a novel regression GNN model (namely RegGNN) for predicting IQ scores from brain connectivity. On top of that, we introduce a novel, fully modular sample selection method to select the best samples to learn from for our target prediction task. However, since such deep learning architectures are computationally expensive to train, we further propose a learning-based sample selection method that learns how to choose the training samples with the highest expected predictive power on unseen samples. For this, we capitalize on the fact that connectomes (i.e., their adjacency matrices) lie in the symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix cone. Our results on full-scale and verbal IQ prediction outperforms comparison methods in autism spectrum disorder cohorts and achieves a competitive performance for neurotypical subjects using 3-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, we show that our sample selection approach generalizes to other learning-based methods, which shows its usefulness beyond our GNN architecture.
