# Reservoir optimization and Machine Learning methods

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08097 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08097/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Mean-field neural networks: learning mappings on Wasserstein space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15179/) (2022)
- [Mean-field neural networks-based algorithms for McKean-Vlasov control problems *](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.11518/) (2022)
- [Control randomisation approach for policy gradient and application to reinforcement learning in optimal switching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17939/) (2024)
- [P1-KAN: an effective Kolmogorov-Arnold network with application to hydraulic valley optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03801/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

After showing the efficiency of feedforward networks to estimate control in high dimension in the global optimization of some storages problems, we develop a modification of an algorithm based on some dynamic programming principle. We show that classical feedforward networks are not effective to estimate Bellman values for reservoir problems and we propose some neural networks giving far better results. At last, we develop a new algorithm mixing LP resolution and conditional cuts calculated by neural networks to solve some stochastic linear problems.
