# Case Study on Detecting COVID-19 Health-Related Misinformation in Social Media

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06811 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06811/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Fighting an Infodemic: COVID-19 Fake News Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03327/) (2020)
- [The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05004/) (2020)
- [Transformer based Automatic COVID-19 Fake News Detection System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00180/) (2021)
- [A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13907/) (2020)
- [Induction of Selective Bayesian Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1302.6828/) (2013)
- [Characterizing the Landscape of COVID-19 Themed Cyberattacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13223/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

COVID-19 pandemic has generated what public health officials called an infodemic of misinformation. As social distancing and stay-at-home orders came into effect, many turned to social media for socializing. This increase in social media usage has made it a prime vehicle for the spreading of misinformation. This paper presents a mechanism to detect COVID-19 health-related misinformation in social media following an interdisciplinary approach. Leveraging social psychology as a foundation and existing misinformation frameworks, we defined misinformation themes and associated keywords incorporated into the misinformation detection mechanism using applied machine learning techniques. Next, using the Twitter dataset, we explored the performance of the proposed methodology using multiple state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers. Our method shows promising results with at most 78% accuracy in classifying health-related misinformation versus true information using uni-gram-based NLP feature generations from tweets and the Decision Tree classifier. We also provide suggestions on alternatives for countering misinformation and ethical consideration for the study.
