# A note on the modeling of the effects of experimental time in psycholinguistic experiments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13786 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13786/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Word-specific tonal realizations in Mandarin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07006/) (2024)
- [How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling Lexical Decision with Linear Discriminative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00430/) (2022)
- [A new kid on the block: Distributional semantics predicts the word-specific tone signatures of monosyllabic words in conversational Taiwan Mandarin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17337/) (2025)
- [A corpus-based investigation of pitch contours of monosyllabic words in conversational Taiwan Mandarin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07891/) (2024)
- [An Exploratory Analysis on the Explanatory Potential of Embedding-Based Measures of Semantic Transparency for Malay Word Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05973/) (2025)
- [An experimental and computational study of an Estonian single-person word naming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03143/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Thul et al. (2020) called attention to problems that arise when chronometric experiments implementing specific factorial designs are analysed with the generalized additive mixed model (GAMM), using factor smooths to capture trial-to-trial dependencies. From a series of simulations incorporating such dependencies, they conclude that GAMMs are inappropriate for between-subject designs. They argue that in addition GAMMs come with too many modeling possibilities, and advise using the linear mixed model (LMM) instead. We address the questions raised by Thul et al. (2020), who clearly demonstrated that problems can indeed arise when using factor smooths in combination with factorial designs. We show that the problem does not arise when using by-smooths. Furthermore, we have traced a bug in the implementation of factor smooths in the mgcv package, which will have been removed from version 1.8-36 onwards. To illustrate that GAMMs now produce correct estimates, we report simulation studies implementing different by-subject longitudinal effects. The maximal LMM emerges as slightly conservative compared to GAMMs, and GAMMs provide estimated coefficients that can be less variable across simulation runs. We also discuss two datasets where time-varying effects interact with numerical predictors in a theoretically informative way. Furthermore, we argue that the wide range of tools that GAMMs make available to researcher across all domains of scientific inquiry do not come with uncontrolled researcher degrees of freedom once confronted with a specific psycholinguistic datasets. We also introduce a distinction between replicable and non-replicable non-linear effects. We conclude that GAMMs are an excellent and reliable tool for understanding experimental data, including chronometric data with time-varying effects.