# Few-Shot Upsampling for Protest Size Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11260 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11260/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.10160/) (2017)
- [Rationalizing Neural Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04155/) (2016)
- [The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08730/) (2018)
- [Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04577/) (2017)
- [Strength from Weakness: Fast Learning Using Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08483/) (2020)
- [Semi-supervised Classification using Attention-based Regularization on Coarse-resolution Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00994/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE 2021): Workshop and Shared Task Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07865/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Codebook Knowledge with NLI and ChatGPT for Zero-Shot Political Relation Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07876/) (2023)
- [ConfliBERT: A Language Model for Political Conflict](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15060/) (2024)
- [When Better Codebooks Are Not Enough: Predictive Performance and Behavioral Reliability in LLM Political Event Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06781/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new task and dataset for a common problem in social science research: "upsampling" coarse document labels to fine-grained labels or spans. We pose the problem in a question answering format, with the answers providing the fine-grained labels. We provide a benchmark dataset and baselines on a socially impactful task: identifying the exact crowd size at protests and demonstrations in the United States given only order-of-magnitude information about protest attendance, a very small sample of fine-grained examples, and English-language news text. We evaluate several baseline models, including zero-shot results from rule-based and question-answering models, few-shot models fine-tuned on a small set of documents, and weakly supervised models using a larger set of coarsely-labeled documents. We find that our rule-based model initially outperforms a zero-shot pre-trained transformer language model but that further fine-tuning on a very small subset of 25 examples substantially improves out-of-sample performance. We also demonstrate a method for fine-tuning the transformer span on only the coarse labels that performs similarly to our rule-based approach. This work will contribute to social scientists' ability to generate data to understand the causes and successes of collective action.
