# Budget-Constrained Coalition Strategies with Discounting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04692 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04692/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Together We Know How to Achieve: An Epistemic Logic of Know-How](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09349/) (2017)
- [Strategically knowing how](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.05254/) (2017)
- [Strategic Coalitions with Perfect Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.04298/) (2017)
- [Technical Report: Model-Checking for Resource-Bounded ATL with Production and Consumption of Resources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06766/) (2015)
- [Resource Logics with a Diminishing Resource](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.11559/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Discounting in Strategy Logic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15256/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Discounting future costs and rewards is a common practice in accounting, game theory, and machine learning. In spite of this, existing logics for reasoning about strategies with cost and resource constraints do not account for discounting. The paper proposes a sound and complete logical system for reasoning about budget-constrained strategic abilities that incorporates discounting into its semantics.