# Regularizing Explanations in Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02653 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02653/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.00670/) (2016)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00444/) (2020)
- [Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03368/) (2019)
- [Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07896/) (2020)
- [Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trick](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02557/) (2015)
- [Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learn](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10178/) (2019)
- [Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06823/) (2020)
- [Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03717/) (2017)
- [Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.05369/) (2017)
- [Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13584/) (2019)
- [Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.05371/) (2020)
- [Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03751/) (2019)
- [Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08286/) (2019)
- [Learning Credible Deep Neural Networks with Rationale Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05601/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Explanation-Based Human Debugging of NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.15135/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks are powerful function approximators with tremendous potential in learning complex distributions. However, they are prone to overfitting on spurious patterns. Bayesian inference provides a principled way to regularize neural networks and give well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. It allows us to specify prior knowledge on weights. However, specifying domain knowledge via distributions over weights is infeasible. Furthermore, it is unable to correct models when they focus on spurious or irrelevant features. New methods within explainable artificial intelligence allow us to regularize explanations in the form of feature importance to add domain knowledge and correct the models' focus. Nevertheless, they are incompatible with Bayesian neural networks, as they require us to modify the loss function. We propose a new explanation regularization method that is compatible with Bayesian inference. Consequently, we can quantify uncertainty and, at the same time, have correct explanations. We test our method using four different datasets. The results show that our method improves predictive performance when models overfit on spurious features or are uncertain of which features to focus on. Moreover, our method performs better than augmenting training data with samples where spurious features are removed through masking. We provide code, data, trained weights, and hyperparameters.