# Real Negatives Matter: Continuous Training with Real Negatives for Delayed Feedback Modeling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14121 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14121/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06978/) (2017)
- [Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03672/) (2018)
- [Entire Space Multi-Task Model: An Effective Approach for Estimating Post-Click Conversion Rate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07931/) (2018)
- [Online Learning under Delayed Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.0686/) (2013)
- [One Model to Serve All: Star Topology Adaptive Recommender for Multi-Domain CTR Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11427/) (2021)
- [Stochastic Bandit Models for Delayed Conversions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.09186/) (2017)
- [Display Advertising with Real-Time Bidding (RTB) and Behavioural Targeting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.03013/) (2016)
- [Addressing Delayed Feedback for Continuous Training with Neural Networks in CTR prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06558/) (2019)
- [A Nonparametric Delayed Feedback Model for Conversion Rate Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00255/) (2018)
- [Capturing Delayed Feedback in Conversion Rate Prediction via Elapsed-Time Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03245/) (2020)
- [A Feedback Shift Correction in Predicting Conversion Rates under Delayed Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02068/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Towards Understanding the Overfitting Phenomenon of Deep Click-Through Rate Prediction Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06053/) (2022)
- [Enhancing Taobao Display Advertising with Multimodal Representations: Challenges, Approaches and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19467/) (2024)
- [Joint Optimization of Ranking and Calibration with Contextualized Hybrid Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06164/) (2022)
- [Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation for Delayed Feedback Modeling via Label Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06472/) (2022)
- [KEEP: An Industrial Pre-Training Framework for Online Recommendation via Knowledge Extraction and Plugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10174/) (2022)
- [Generalized Delayed Feedback Model with Post-Click Information in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00407/) (2022)
- [Capturing Conversion Rate Fluctuation during Sales Promotions: A Novel Historical Data Reuse Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12837/) (2023)
- [MC2-SF: Slow-Fast Learning for Mobile-Cloud Collaborative Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12314/) (2021)
- [See Beyond a Single View: Multi-Attribution Learning Leads to Better Conversion Rate Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15217/) (2025)
- [Ensure Timeliness and Accuracy: A Novel Sliding Window Data Stream Paradigm for Live Streaming Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14399/) (2024)
- [Modeling Cascaded Delay Feedback for Online Net Conversion Rate Prediction: Benchmark, Insights and Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19965/) (2026)
- [Delayed Feedback Modeling for Post-Click Gross Merchandise Volume Prediction: Benchmark, Insights and Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20307/) (2026)
- [Delayed Feedback Modeling with Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01669/) (2025)
- [MAC: A Conversion Rate Prediction Benchmark Featuring Labels Under Multiple Attribution Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02184/) (2026)
- [Multi-Head Online Learning for Delayed Feedback Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12406/) (2022)
- [Freshness or Accuracy, Why Not Both? Addressing Delayed Feedback via Dynamic Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08071/) (2023)
- [Conversion rate prediction in online advertising: modeling techniques, performance evaluation and future directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01171/) (2025)
- [Follow the TRACE: Exploiting Post-Click Trajectories for Online Delayed Conversion Rate Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23197/) (2026)
- [TWICE: Two-Clock, Two-Window Learning for Long-Horizon Conversion Prediction in Online Advertising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25404/) (2026)
- [DMRL: Document-Mediated Reinforcement Learning for Skill Optimization in Advertising Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02170/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

One of the difficulties of conversion rate (CVR) prediction is that the conversions can delay and take place long after the clicks. The delayed feedback poses a challenge: fresh data are beneficial to continuous training but may not have complete label information at the time they are ingested into the training pipeline. To balance model freshness and label certainty, previous methods set a short waiting window or even do not wait for the conversion signal. If conversion happens outside the waiting window, this sample will be duplicated and ingested into the training pipeline with a positive label. However, these methods have some issues. First, they assume the observed feature distribution remains the same as the actual distribution. But this assumption does not hold due to the ingestion of duplicated samples. Second, the certainty of the conversion action only comes from the positives. But the positives are scarce as conversions are sparse in commercial systems. These issues induce bias during the modeling of delayed feedback. In this paper, we propose DElayed FEedback modeling with Real negatives (DEFER) method to address these issues. The proposed method ingests real negative samples into the training pipeline. The ingestion of real negatives ensures the observed feature distribution is equivalent to the actual distribution, thus reducing the bias. The ingestion of real negatives also brings more certainty information of the conversion. To correct the distribution shift, DEFER employs importance sampling to weigh the loss function. Experimental results on industrial datasets validate the superiority of DEFER. DEFER have been deployed in the display advertising system of Alibaba, obtaining over 6.0% improvement on CVR in several scenarios. The code and data in this paper are now open-sourced {https://github.com/gusuperstar/defer.git}.
