# Interpretation of multi-label classification models using shapley values

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10505 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10505/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02407/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [DILA: Dictionary Label Attention for Mechanistic Interpretability in High-dimensional Multi-label Medical Coding Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10504/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-label classification is a type of classification task, it is used when there are two or more classes, and the data point we want to predict may belong to none of the classes or all of them at the same time. In the real world, many applications are actually multi-label involved, including information retrieval, multimedia content annotation, web mining, and so on. A game theory-based framework known as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) has been applied to explain various supervised learning models without being aware of the exact model. Herein, this work further extends the explanation of multi-label classification task by using the SHAP methodology. The experiment demonstrates a comprehensive comparision of different algorithms on well known multi-label datasets and shows the usefulness of the interpretation.