# Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04302 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04302/

## Key facts

- Cited by 131 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00661/) (2020)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04434/) (2017)
- [Generating Fact Checking Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05773/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05478/) (2020)
- [Combining Fact Extraction and Verification with Neural Semantic Matching Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07039/) (2018)
- [Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08712/) (2020)
- [Optimizing the Factual Correctness of a Summary: A Study of Summarizing Radiology Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02541/) (2019)
- [Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14589/) (2020)
- [Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02443/) (2020)
- [Sticking to the Facts: Confident Decoding for Faithful Data-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08684/) (2019)
- [Neural Syntactic Preordering for Controlled Paraphrase Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.02013/) (2020)
- [Learning-Based Single-Document Summarization with Compression and Anaphoricity Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08887/) (2016)
- [Constrained Abstractive Summarization: Preserving Factual Consistency with Constrained Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12723/) (2020)
- [Reducing Quantity Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13312/) (2020)
- [Analyzing Sentence Fusion in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00203/) (2019)
- [Controlling the Amount of Verbatim Copying in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10390/) (2019)
- [Joint Parsing and Generation for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10389/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 131)

- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12356/) (2022)
- [Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14739/) (2023)
- [RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08726/) (2022)
- [MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10774/) (2024)
- [Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06935/) (2022)
- [BooookScore: A systematic exploration of book-length summarization in the era of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00785/) (2023)
- [CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09209/) (2021)
- [WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01432/) (2023)
- [FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10757/) (2022)
- [Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12854/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02901/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08412/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Human-Language Model Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09746/) (2022)
- [Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09061/) (2021)
- [Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10817/) (2024)
- [Do Androids Know They're Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17249/) (2023)
- [TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13249/) (2024)
- [FactKB: Generalizable Factuality Evaluation using Language Models Enhanced with Factual Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08281/) (2023)
- [Faithful or Extractive? On Mitigating the Faithfulness-Abstractiveness Trade-off in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13684/) (2021)
- [FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07830/) (2022)
- [Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13632/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Produce Faithful Explanations For Fact-checking? Towards Faithful Explainable Fact-Checking via Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07401/) (2024)
- [Prompted Opinion Summarization with GPT-3.5](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15914/) (2022)
- [Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text Summarization with In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01200/) (2023)
- [Molecular Facts: Desiderata for Decontextualization in LLM Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.20079/) (2024)
- [mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10622/) (2022)
- [Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11932/) (2023)
- [FactGraph: Evaluating Factuality in Summarization with Semantic Graph Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06508/) (2022)
- [Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infilling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12378/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent pre-trained abstractive summarization systems have started to achieve credible performance, but a major barrier to their use in practice is their propensity to output summaries that are not faithful to the input and that contain factual errors. While a number of annotated datasets and statistical models for assessing factuality have been explored, there is no clear picture of what errors are most important to target or where current techniques are succeeding and failing. We explore both synthetic and human-labeled data sources for training models to identify factual errors in summarization, and study factuality at the word-, dependency-, and sentence-level. Our observations are threefold. First, exhibited factual errors differ significantly across datasets, and commonly-used training sets of simple synthetic errors do not reflect errors made on abstractive datasets like XSum. Second, human-labeled data with fine-grained annotations provides a more effective training signal than sentence-level annotations or synthetic data. Finally, we show that our best factuality detection model enables training of more factual XSum summarization models by allowing us to identify non-factual tokens in the training data.