# Efficacy of Bayesian Neural Networks in Active Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00896 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00896/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.02910/) (2017)
- [An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6211/) (2013)
- [BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08158/) (2019)
- [Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.02072/) (2017)
- [Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.05369/) (2017)
- [Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04737/) (2017)
- [Bayesian Compression for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08665/) (2017)
- [Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09564/) (2020)
- [Active Learning for Convolutional Neural Networks: A Core-Set Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.00489/) (2017)
- [Bayesian active learning for production, a systematic study and a reusable library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09916/) (2020)
- [House price estimation from visual and textual features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.08399/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Active Prompt Learning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11178/) (2023)
- [The Speed-up Factor: A Quantitative Multi-Iteration Active Learning Performance Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13359/) (2026)
- [PCoreSet: Effective Active Learning through Knowledge Distillation from Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00910/) (2025)
- [Active learning for photonic crystals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16287/) (2026)
- [Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14689/) (2026)
- [Balancing Uncertainty and Diversity of Samples: Leveraging Diversity of Least, High Confidence Samples for Effective Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22169/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Obtaining labeled data for machine learning tasks can be prohibitively expensive. Active learning mitigates this issue by exploring the unlabeled data space and prioritizing the selection of data that can best improve the model performance. A common approach to active learning is to pick a small sample of data for which the model is most uncertain. In this paper, we explore the efficacy of Bayesian neural networks for active learning, which naturally models uncertainty by learning distribution over the weights of neural networks. By performing a comprehensive set of experiments, we show that Bayesian neural networks are more efficient than ensemble based techniques in capturing uncertainty. Our findings also reveal some key drawbacks of the ensemble techniques, which was recently shown to be more effective than Monte Carlo dropouts.
