# Is segmentation uncertainty useful?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.16265 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16265/

## Key facts

- Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.05006/) (2017)
- [A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05034/) (2018)
- [Stochastic Segmentation Networks: Modelling Spatially Correlated Aleatoric Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06015/) (2020)
- [Assessing Reliability and Challenges of Uncertainty Estimations for Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03338/) (2019)
- [A Benchmark and Comparison of Active Learning for Logistic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08618/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06873/) (2023)
- [ValUES: A Framework for Systematic Validation of Uncertainty Estimation in Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08501/) (2024)
- [Tyche: Stochastic In-Context Learning for Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13650/) (2024)
- [Conformal Semantic Image Segmentation: Post-hoc Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05145/) (2024)
- [Maximum Entropy on Erroneous Predictions (MEEP): Improving model calibration for medical image segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.12218/) (2021)
- [That Label's Got Style: Handling Label Style Bias for Uncertain Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15850/) (2023)
- [PatchRefineNet: Improving Binary Segmentation by Incorporating Signals from Optimal Patch-wise Binarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06560/) (2022)
- [Active learning using adaptable task-based prioritisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01703/) (2022)
- [A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16370/) (2024)
- [Deep Quantile Regression for Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised and Supervised Lesion Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09374/) (2021)
- [Weakly supervised localisation of prostate cancer using reinforcement learning for bi-parametric MR images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13778/) (2024)
- [Segmentation by registration-enabled SAM prompt engineering using five reference images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17933/) (2024)
- [Arctique: An artificial histopathological dataset unifying realism and controllability for uncertainty quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07097/) (2024)
- [Quantifying U-Net Uncertainty in Multi-Parametric MRI-based Glioma Segmentation by Spherical Image Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06512/) (2022)
- [Boundary-RL: Reinforcement Learning for Weakly-Supervised Prostate Segmentation in TRUS Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11376/) (2023)
- [Generalizable Pancreas Segmentation via a Dual Self-Supervised Learning Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07165/) (2025)
- [Flow Stochastic Segmentation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18838/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty Estimation for 3D Dense Prediction via Cross-Point Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14602/) (2022)
- [Promptable cancer segmentation using minimal expert-curated data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17915/) (2025)
- [Towards Reliable WMH Segmentation under Domain Shift: An Application Study using Maximum Entropy Regularization to Improve Uncertainty Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14497/) (2025)
- [Effect of the output activation function on the probabilities and errors in medical image segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00903/) (2021)
- [Distributional Gaussian Processes Layers for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13346/) (2022)
- [Unsupervised bias discovery in medical image segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00451/) (2023)
- [PULASki: Learning inter-rater variability using statistical distances to improve probabilistic segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15686/) (2023)
- [Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Applications to Cardiac MRI Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02311/) (2024)
- [SPARS: Self-Play Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Segmentation of Liver Tumours](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18989/) (2025)
- [A Probabilistic Segment Anything Model for Ambiguity-Aware Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05809/) (2025)
- [Progressive Growing of Patch Size: Curriculum Learning for Accelerated and Improved Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23241/) (2025)
- [Test-Time Mixup Augmentation for Data and Class-Specific Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00214/) (2022)
- [Uncertainty quantification for White Matter Hyperintensity segmentation detects silent failures and improves automated Fazekas quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17571/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Probabilistic image segmentation encodes varying prediction confidence and inherent ambiguity in the segmentation problem. While different probabilistic segmentation models are designed to capture different aspects of segmentation uncertainty and ambiguity, these modelling differences are rarely discussed in the context of applications of uncertainty. We consider two common use cases of segmentation uncertainty, namely assessment of segmentation quality and active learning. We consider four established strategies for probabilistic segmentation, discuss their modelling capabilities, and investigate their performance in these two tasks. We find that for all models and both tasks, returned uncertainty correlates positively with segmentation error, but does not prove to be useful for active learning.
