# Fairness-aware Personalized Ranking Recommendation via Adversarial Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07849 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07849/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13619/) (2022)
- [Unveiling Bias in Fairness Evaluations of Large Language Models: A Critical Literature Review of Music and Movie Recommendation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04057/) (2024)
- [Automatic Feature Fairness in Recommendation via Adversaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15418/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recommendation algorithms typically build models based on historical user-item interactions (e.g., clicks, likes, or ratings) to provide a personalized ranked list of items. These interactions are often distributed unevenly over different groups of items due to varying user preferences. However, we show that recommendation algorithms can inherit or even amplify this imbalanced distribution, leading to unfair recommendations to item groups. Concretely, we formalize the concepts of ranking-based statistical parity and equal opportunity as two measures of fairness in personalized ranking recommendation for item groups. Then, we empirically show that one of the most widely adopted algorithms -- Bayesian Personalized Ranking -- produces unfair recommendations, which motivates our effort to propose the novel fairness-aware personalized ranking model. The debiased model is able to improve the two proposed fairness metrics while preserving recommendation performance. Experiments on three public datasets show strong fairness improvement of the proposed model versus state-of-the-art alternatives. This is paper is an extended and reorganized version of our SIGIR 2020~citezhu2020measuring paper. In this paper, we re-frame the studied problem as `item recommendation fairness' in personalized ranking recommendation systems, and provide more details about the training process of the proposed model and details of experiment setup.