# A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Human Preference for Graph Layouts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03665 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03665/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [A Deep Generative Model for Graph Layout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12225/) (2019)
- [DeepDrawing: A Deep Learning Approach to Graph Drawing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11040/) (2019)
- [Evaluating the Readability of Force Directed Graph Layouts: A Deep Learning Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00703/) (2018)
- [Aesthetic Discrimination of Graph Layouts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01017/) (2018)
- [A Quality Metric for Visualization of Clusters in Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07792/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Beauty in the Eye of AI: Aligning LLMs and Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Network Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03417/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding what graph layout human prefer and why they prefer is significant and challenging due to the highly complex visual perception and cognition system in human brain. In this paper, we present the first machine learning approach for predicting human preference for graph layouts. In general, the data sets with human preference labels are limited and insufficient for training deep networks. To address this, we train our deep learning model by employing the transfer learning method, e.g., exploiting the quality metrics, such as shape-based metrics, edge crossing and stress, which are shown to be correlated to human preference on graph layouts. Experimental results using the ground truth human preference data sets show that our model can successfully predict human preference for graph layouts. To our best knowledge, this is the first approach for predicting qualitative evaluation of graph layouts using human preference experiment data.