# Unintended Effects on Adaptive Learning Rate for Training Neural Network with Output Scale Change

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03466 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03466/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03962/) (2018)
- [Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06720/) (2019)
- [On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.07956/) (2018)
- [Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02054/) (2018)
- [Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08584/) (2019)
- [A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06561/) (2018)
- [On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09545/) (2018)
- [Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09277/) (2020)
- [Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04486/) (2020)
- [The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02218/) (2020)
- [Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13192/) (2019)
- [Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15801/) (2020)
- [Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regime](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01054/) (2020)
- [Limitations of Lazy Training of Two-layers Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08899/) (2019)
- [Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01663/) (2019)
- [Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.01608/) (2019)
- [Beyond Linearization: On Quadratic and Higher-Order Approximation of Wide Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01619/) (2019)
- [Learning Over-Parametrized Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks beyond NTK](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04596/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A multiplicative constant scaling factor is often applied to the model output to adjust the dynamics of neural network parameters. This has been used as one of the key interventions in an empirical study of lazy and active behavior. However, we show that the combination of such scaling and a commonly used adaptive learning rate optimizer strongly affects the training behavior of the neural network. This is problematic as it can cause unintended behavior of neural networks, resulting in the misinterpretation of experimental results. Specifically, for some scaling settings, the effect of the adaptive learning rate disappears or is strongly influenced by the scaling factor. To avoid the unintended effect, we present a modification of an optimization algorithm and demonstrate remarkable differences between adaptive learning rate optimization and simple gradient descent, especially with a small (<1.0) scaling factor.