# MPED: Quantifying Point Cloud Distortion based on Multiscale Potential Energy Discrepancy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02850 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02850/

## Key facts

- Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03012/) (2015)
- [Accelerating 3D Deep Learning with PyTorch3D](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08501/) (2020)
- [AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05384/) (2018)
- [PU-Net: Point Cloud Upsampling Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.06761/) (2018)
- [PF-Net: Point Fractal Network for 3D Point Cloud Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00410/) (2020)
- [Morphing and Sampling Network for Dense Point Cloud Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00280/) (2019)
- [PU-GCN: Point Cloud Upsampling using Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03264/) (2019)
- [Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.00497/) (2020)
- [Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11895/) (2020)
- [Reduced Reference Perceptual Quality Model and Application to Rate Control for 3D Point Cloud Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12688/) (2020)
- [Fast Resampling of 3D Point Clouds via Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.06397/) (2017)
- [Point Cloud Rendering after Coding: Impacts on Subjective and Objective Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09137/) (2019)
- [TearingNet: Point Cloud Autoencoder to Learn Topology-Friendly Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10187/) (2020)
- [DPDist : Comparing Point Clouds Using Deep Point Cloud Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11784/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning of 3D Point Clouds via Graph Topology Inference and Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04571/) (2019)
- [Improving PSNR-based Quality Metrics Performance For Point Cloud Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03714/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14085/) (2022)
- [GPA-Net:No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Multi-task Graph Convolutional Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.16478/) (2022)
- [A Benchmark for Gaussian Splatting Compression and Quality Assessment Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14197/) (2024)
- [Contrastive Pre-Training with Multi-View Fusion for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10066/) (2024)
- [TSMD: A Database for Static Color Mesh Quality Assessment Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01940/) (2023)
- [TCDM: Transformational Complexity Based Distortion Metric for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04671/) (2022)
- [No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Graph Convolutional Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07728/) (2024)
- [Reduced Reference Quality Assessment for Point Cloud Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01009/) (2023)
- [TDMD: A Database for Dynamic Color Mesh Subjective and Objective Quality Explorations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01499/) (2023)
- [Perception-Guided Quality Metric of 3D Point Clouds Using Hybrid Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03885/) (2024)
- [Progressive Knowledge Transfer Based on Human Visual Perception Mechanism for Perceptual Quality Assessment of Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16646/) (2022)
- [GeodesicPSIM: Predicting the Quality of Static Mesh with Texture Map via Geodesic Patch Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04928/) (2023)
- [PAME: Self-Supervised Masked Autoencoder for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10061/) (2024)
- [3DGS-VBench: A Comprehensive Video Quality Evaluation Benchmark for 3DGS Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07038/) (2025)
- [TCFNet: Bidirectional face-bone transformation via a Transformer-based coarse-to-fine point movement network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14373/) (2025)
- [PIT-QMM: A Large Multimodal Model For No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07636/) (2025)
- [Asynchronous Feedback Network for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09806/) (2024)
- [RBFIM: Perceptual Quality Assessment for Compressed Point Clouds Using Radial Basis Function Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14154/) (2025)
- [Lightweight 3D Gaussian Splatting Compression via Video Codec](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11186/) (2025)
- [Point Cloud Quality Assessment using 3D Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15475/) (2022)
- [From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13387/) (2025)
- [Deep-JGAC: End-to-End Deep Joint Geometry and Attribute Compression for Dense Colored Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17939/) (2025)
- [Low-Complexity Patch-based No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Metric exploiting Weighted Structure and Texture Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15001/) (2025)
- [Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22902/) (2025)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06689/) (2024)
- [Point Cloud Quality Assessment Using the Perceptual Clustering Weighted Graph (PCW-Graph) and Attention Fusion Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04081/) (2025)
- [Objective Quality Assessment of Point Clouds Using Multi-scale Implicit Structural Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01200/) (2026)
- [PointQ-Bench: Benchmarking Diagnostic and Interpretable Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28241/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a new distortion quantification method for point clouds, the multiscale potential energy discrepancy (MPED). Currently, there is a lack of effective distortion quantification for a variety of point cloud perception tasks. Specifically, for dense point clouds, a distortion quantification method is used to predict human subjective scores and optimize the selection of human perception tasks parameters, such as compression and enhancement. For sparse point clouds, a distortion quantification methods is work as a loss function to guide the training of deep neural networks for unsupervised learning tasks (e.g., point cloud reconstruction, completion and upsampling). Therefore, an effective distortion quantification should be differentiable, distortion discriminable and have a low computational complexity. However, current distortion quantification cannot satisfy all three conditions. To fill this gap, we propose a new point cloud feature description method, the point potential energy (PPE), inspired by the classical physics. We regard the point clouds are systems that have potential energy and the distortion can change the total potential energy. By evaluating at various neighborhood sizes, the proposed MPED achieves global-local tradeoffs, capturing distortion in a multiscale fashion. We further theoretically show that classical Chamfer distance is a special case of our MPED. Extensive experiments show the proposed MPED superior to current methods on both human and machine perception tasks. Our code is avaliable at https://github.com/Qi-Yangsjtu/MPED.
