# Validating Clustering Frameworks for Electric Load Demand Profiles

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00030 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00030/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Using U-Net Network for Efficient Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01885/) (2022)
- [Analyzing the impact of feature selection on the accuracy of heart disease prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.03239/) (2022)
- [Graph-based Local Climate Classification in Iran](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09209/) (2021)
- [A semantic web approach to uplift decentralized household energy data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10265/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale deployment of smart meters has made it possible to collect sufficient and high-resolution data of residential electric demand profiles. Clustering analysis of these profiles is important to further analyze and comment on electricity consumption patterns. Although many clustering techniques have been proposed in the literature over the years, it is often noticed that different techniques fit best for different datasets. To identify the most suitable technique, standard clustering validity indices are often used. These indices focus primarily on the intrinsic characteristics of the clustering results. Moreover, different indices often give conflicting recommendations which can only be clarified with heuristics about the dataset and/or the expected cluster structures -- information that is rarely available in practical situations. This paper presents a novel scheme to validate and compare the clustering results objectively. Additionally, the proposed scheme considers all the steps prior to the clustering algorithm, including the pre-processing and dimensionality reduction steps, in order to provide recommendations over the complete framework. Accordingly, the proposed strategy is shown to provide better, unbiased, and uniform recommendations as compared to the standard Clustering Validity Indices.