# Residue Density Segmentation for Monitoring and Optimizing Tillage Practices

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04866 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04866/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05034/) (2018)
- [Effective Data Fusion with Generalized Vegetation Index: Evidence from Land Cover Segmentation in Agriculture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03743/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

"No-till" and cover cropping are often identified as the leading simple, best management practices for carbon sequestration in agriculture. However, the root of the problem is more complex, with the potential benefits of these approaches depending on numerous factors including a field's soil type(s), topography, and management history. Instead of using computer vision approaches to simply classify a field a still vs. no-till, we instead seek to identify the degree of residue coverage across afield through a probabilistic deep learning segmentation approach to enable more accurate analysis of carbon holding potential and realization. This approach will not only provide more precise insights into currently implemented practices, but also enable a more accurate identification process of fields with the greatest potential for adopting new practices to significantly impact carbon sequestration in agriculture.