# Robust Single-step Adversarial Training with Regularizer

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03381 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03381/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.05027/) (2016)
- [Adversarial examples in the physical world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.02533/) (2016)
- [Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00420/) (2018)
- [Mixed Precision Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03740/) (2017)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03994/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Training for Free!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12843/) (2019)
- [Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01186/) (2015)
- [Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07263/) (2017)
- [Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00117/) (2017)
- [Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.06605/) (2018)
- [Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifacts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00410/) (2017)
- [On Detecting Adversarial Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.04267/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Logit Pairing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06373/) (2018)
- [Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02617/) (2020)
- [You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00877/) (2019)
- [Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08628/) (2020)
- [Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03089/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

High cost of training time caused by multi-step adversarial example generation is a major challenge in adversarial training. Previous methods try to reduce the computational burden of adversarial training using single-step adversarial example generation schemes, which can effectively improve the efficiency but also introduce the problem of catastrophic overfitting, where the robust accuracy against Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) can achieve nearby 100% whereas the robust accuracy against Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) suddenly drops to 0% over a single epoch. To address this problem, we propose a novel Fast Gradient Sign Method with PGD Regularization (FGSMPR) to boost the efficiency of adversarial training without catastrophic overfitting. Our core idea is that single-step adversarial training can not learn robust internal representations of FGSM and PGD adversarial examples. Therefore, we design a PGD regularization term to encourage similar embeddings of FGSM and PGD adversarial examples. The experiments demonstrate that our proposed method can train a robust deep network for L_∞-perturbations with FGSM adversarial training and reduce the gap to multi-step adversarial training.