# TUDublin team at Constraint@AAAI2021 -- COVID19 Fake News Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05701 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05701/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Fighting an Infodemic: COVID-19 Fake News Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03327/) (2020)
- [Text Classification Improved by Integrating Bidirectional LSTM with Two-dimensional Max Pooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.06639/) (2016)
- [COVID-19 Pandemic: Identifying Key Issues using Social Media and Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10022/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [A Heuristic-driven Uncertainty based Ensemble Framework for Fake News Detection in Tweets and News Articles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.01791/) (2021)
- [The use of Data Augmentation as a technique for improving neural network accuracy in detecting fake news about COVID-19](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00452/) (2022)
- [Automated Evidence Collection for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06507/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The paper is devoted to the participation of the TUDublin team in Constraint@AAAI2021 - COVID19 Fake News Detection Challenge. Today, the problem of fake news detection is more acute than ever in connection with the pandemic. The number of fake news is increasing rapidly and it is necessary to create AI tools that allow us to identify and prevent the spread of false information about COVID-19 urgently. The main goal of the work was to create a model that would carry out a binary classification of messages from social media as real or fake news in the context of COVID-19. Our team constructed the ensemble consisting of Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes and a combination of Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes. The model allowed us to achieve 0.94 F1-score, which is within 5% of the best result.
