# The Vulnerability of Semantic Segmentation Networks to Adversarial Attacks in Autonomous Driving: Enhancing Extensive Environment Sensing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03924 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03924/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01685/) (2016)
- [DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04599/) (2015)
- [Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00420/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Machine Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01236/) (2016)
- [Universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08401/) (2016)
- [Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07263/) (2017)
- [Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00117/) (2017)
- [Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03411/) (2018)
- [ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.08545/) (2017)
- [On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09856/) (2017)
- [Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05712/) (2017)
- [Generalizable Data-free Objective for Crafting Universal Adversarial Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.08092/) (2018)
- [Fast Feature Fool: A data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.05572/) (2017)
- [Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09884/) (2019)
- [A Game-Based Approximate Verification of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03571/) (2018)
- [Verification of deep probabilistic models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02795/) (2018)
- [The Attack Generator: A Systematic Approach Towards Constructing Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07077/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [SegPGD: An Effective and Efficient Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Boosting Segmentation Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12391/) (2022)
- [Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06179/) (2021)
- [On the Real-World Adversarial Robustness of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Models for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01850/) (2022)
- [Detecting Adversarial Perturbations in Multi-Task Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01177/) (2022)
- [Reducing Texture Bias of Deep Neural Networks via Edge Enhancing Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09530/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty-weighted Loss Functions for Improved Adversarial Attacks on Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17436/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty-based Detection of Adversarial Attacks in Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12825/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Artifact Detection in EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00727/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Filtering Based Evasion and Backdoor Attacks to EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07231/) (2024)
- [Improving Online Performance Prediction for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05255/) (2021)
- [Detecting Adversarial Attacks in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation: A Deep Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10021/) (2024)
- [A Segmentation Method for fluorescence images without a machine learning approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13945/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Enabling autonomous driving (AD) can be considered one of the biggest challenges in today's technology. AD is a complex task accomplished by several functionalities, with environment perception being one of its core functions. Environment perception is usually performed by combining the semantic information captured by several sensors, i.e., lidar or camera. The semantic information from the respective sensor can be extracted by using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for dense prediction. In the past, CNNs constantly showed state-of-the-art performance on several vision-related tasks, such as semantic segmentation of traffic scenes using nothing but the red-green-blue (RGB) images provided by a camera. Although CNNs obtain state-of-the-art performance on clean images, almost imperceptible changes to the input, referred to as adversarial perturbations, may lead to fatal deception. The goal of this article is to illuminate the vulnerability aspects of CNNs used for semantic segmentation with respect to adversarial attacks, and share insights into some of the existing known adversarial defense strategies. We aim to clarify the advantages and disadvantages associated with applying CNNs for environment perception in AD to serve as a motivation for future research in this field.
