# Tracking Interaction States for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04995 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.04995/

## Key facts

- Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06983/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Text-to-SQL Parsing: Concepts, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.13629/) (2022)
- [HIE-SQL: History Information Enhanced Network for Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07376/) (2022)
- [STAR: SQL Guided Pre-Training for Context-dependent Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11888/) (2022)
- [Interactive Text-to-SQL Generation via Editable Step-by-Step Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07372/) (2023)
- [SUQL: Conversational Search over Structured and Unstructured Data with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09818/) (2023)
- [CoE-SQL: In-Context Learning for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL with Chain-of-Editions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02712/) (2024)
- [CQR-SQL: Conversational Question Reformulation Enhanced Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07686/) (2022)
- [Graph Neural Networks for Databases: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12908/) (2025)
- [Pay More Attention to History: A Context Modelling Strategy for Conversational Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08735/) (2021)
- [MIGA: A Unified Multi-task Generation Framework for Conversational Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09278/) (2022)
- [Abacus-SQL: A Text-to-SQL System Empowering Cross-Domain and Open-Domain Database Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09824/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Compositional Generalization in Context Dependent Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04480/) (2023)
- [Linking-Enhanced Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09486/) (2021)
- [Controllable Data Augmentation for Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13902/) (2023)
- [QURG: Question Rewriting Guided Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06655/) (2023)
- [Conversational Text-to-SQL: An Odyssey into State-of-the-Art and Challenges Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11054/) (2023)
- [Track-SQL: Enhancing Generative Language Models with Dual-Extractive Modules for Schema and Context Tracking in Multi-turn Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05996/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The task of multi-turn text-to-SQL semantic parsing aims to translate natural language utterances in an interaction into SQL queries in order to answer them using a database which normally contains multiple table schemas. Previous studies on this task usually utilized contextual information to enrich utterance representations and to further influence the decoding process. While they ignored to describe and track the interaction states which are determined by history SQL queries and are related with the intent of current utterance. In this paper, two kinds of interaction states are defined based on schema items and SQL keywords separately. A relational graph neural network and a non-linear layer are designed to update the representations of these two states respectively. The dynamic schema-state and SQL-state representations are then utilized to decode the SQL query corresponding to current utterance. Experimental results on the challenging CoSQL dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, which achieves better performance than other published methods on the task leaderboard.