# On Adversarial Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Classification under Adaptive Attacks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11922 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11922/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Shape-invariant 3D Adversarial Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04041/) (2022)
- [PointGuard: Provably Robust 3D Point Cloud Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03046/) (2021)
- [Robustness Certification for Point Cloud Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16652/) (2021)
- [PointDP: Diffusion-driven Purification against Adversarial Attacks on 3D Point Cloud Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09801/) (2022)
- [ART-Point: Improving Rotation Robustness of Point Cloud Classifiers via Adversarial Rotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03888/) (2022)
- [LPF-Defense: 3D Adversarial Defense based on Frequency Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11287/) (2022)
- [Explainability-Aware One Point Attack for Point Cloud Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04158/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on 3D Point Cloud Classification: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00309/) (2023)
- [On Adversarial Robustness of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05871/) (2021)
- [Semantically Adversarial Scenario Generation with Explicit Knowledge Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04066/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

3D point clouds play pivotal roles in various safety-critical applications, such as autonomous driving, which desires the underlying deep neural networks to be robust to adversarial perturbations. Though a few defenses against adversarial point cloud classification have been proposed, it remains unknown whether they are truly robust to adaptive attacks. To this end, we perform the first security analysis of state-of-the-art defenses and design adaptive evaluations on them. Our 100% adaptive attack success rates show that current countermeasures are still vulnerable. Since adversarial training (AT) is believed as the most robust defense, we present the first in-depth study showing how AT behaves in point cloud classification and identify that the required symmetric function (pooling operation) is paramount to the 3D model's robustness under AT. Through our systematic analysis, we find that the default-used fixed pooling (e.g., MAX pooling) generally weakens AT's effectiveness in point cloud classification. Interestingly, we further discover that sorting-based parametric pooling can significantly improve the models' robustness. Based on above insights, we propose DeepSym, a deep symmetric pooling operation, to architecturally advance the robustness to 47.0% under AT without sacrificing nominal accuracy, outperforming the original design and a strong baseline by 28.5% (~ 2.6 ×) and 6.5%, respectively, in PointNet.
