# Causal inference methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies: a review

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.08047 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.08047/

## Key facts

- Cited by 51 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 51)

- [Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08770/) (2024)
- [Long-term Causal Inference Under Persistent Confounding via Data Combination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07234/) (2022)
- [Prediction-powered Generalization of Causal Inferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02873/) (2024)
- [A Tree-based Model Averaging Approach for Personalized Treatment Effect Estimation from Heterogeneous Data Sources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06261/) (2021)
- [Multi-Source Causal Inference Using Control Variates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16689/) (2021)
- [Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder with Uniform Treatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08656/) (2021)
- [Hidden yet quantifiable: A lower bound for confounding strength using randomized trials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03871/) (2023)
- [Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00317/) (2024)
- [Constructing Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects from Multiple Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11511/) (2024)
- [Deep Treatment-Adaptive Network for Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13502/) (2021)
- [Efficient and robust transfer learning of optimal individualized treatment regimes with right-censored survival data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05491/) (2023)
- [Representation Retrieval Learning for Heterogeneous Data Integration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09494/) (2025)
- [Doubly robust estimation of causal effects for random object outcomes with continuous treatments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22754/) (2025)
- [Multi-Study R-Learner for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Across Studies Using Statistical Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01086/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Observational Studies with Experimental Data under Right-Censoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15137/) (2024)
- [Towards Generalizing Inferences from Trials to Target Populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17042/) (2024)
- [Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15746/) (2024)
- [Causal Inference with Latent Variables: Recent Advances and Future Prospectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13966/) (2024)
- [Beyond Reweighting: On the Predictive Role of Covariate Shift in Effect Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08869/) (2024)
- [The Hardness of Validating Observational Studies with Experimental Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14795/) (2025)
- [Reflections from Research Roundtables at the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (CHIL) 2025](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15217/) (2025)
- [Robust Sample Weighting to Facilitate Individualized Treatment Rule Learning for a Target Population](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00581/) (2021)
- [Causal Effect Estimation from Observational and Interventional Data Through Matrix Weighted Linear Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06002/) (2023)
- [Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06231/) (2025)
- [Meta-Analysis with Untrusted Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09387/) (2024)
- [Estimating Joint Interventional Distributions from Marginal Interventional Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01794/) (2024)
- [Clustering and Pruning in Causal Data Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15215/) (2025)
- [Federated Causal Inference from Multi-Site Observational Data via Propensity Score Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17961/) (2025)
- [Probabilistic Modelling is Sufficient for Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23408/) (2025)
- [The Partial Testimony of Logs: Evaluation of Language Model Generation under Confounded Model Choice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01311/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With increasing data availability, causal effects can be evaluated across different data sets, both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. RCTs isolate the effect of the treatment from that of unwanted (confounding) co-occurring effects but they may suffer from unrepresentativeness, and thus lack external validity. On the other hand, large observational samples are often more representative of the target population but can conflate confounding effects with the treatment of interest. In this paper, we review the growing literature on methods for causal inference on combined RCTs and observational studies, striving for the best of both worlds. We first discuss identification and estimation methods that improve generalizability of RCTs using the representativeness of observational data. Classical estimators include weighting, difference between conditional outcome models, and doubly robust estimators. We then discuss methods that combine RCTs and observational data to either ensure uncounfoundedness of the observational analysis or to improve (conditional) average treatment effect estimation. We also connect and contrast works developed in both the potential outcomes literature and the structural causal model literature. Finally, we compare the main methods using a simulation study and real world data to analyze the effect of tranexamic acid on the mortality rate in major trauma patients. A review of available codes and new implementations is also provided.
