# Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00620 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00620/

## Key facts

- Cited by 255 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 255)

- [SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11667/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17884/) (2023)
- [Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05322/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14324/) (2023)
- [Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Do](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11790/) (2021)
- [Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10811/) (2024)
- [Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15412/) (2024)
- [Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13722/) (2022)
- [Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experiment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07574/) (2021)
- [Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12060/) (2021)
- [ProsocialDialog: A Prosocial Backbone for Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12688/) (2022)
- [State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03050/) (2022)
- [Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00779/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10149/) (2023)
- [NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01943/) (2023)
- [The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03021/) (2022)
- [When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01478/) (2022)
- [SOTOPIA-π: Interactive Learning of Socially Intelligent Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08715/) (2024)
- [SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05399/) (2024)
- [Moral Mimicry: Large Language Models Produce Moral Rationalizations Tailored to Political Identity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12106/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02750/) (2023)
- [Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09369/) (2024)
- [Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14725/) (2023)
- [NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17008/) (2023)
- [DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Life](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02683/) (2024)
- [ExplaGraphs: An Explanation Graph Generation Task for Structured Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07644/) (2021)
- [TrustGPT: A Benchmark for Trustworthy and Responsible Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11507/) (2023)
- [Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01349/) (2024)
- [The Past, Present and Better Future of Feedback Learning in Large Language Models for Subjective Human Preferences and Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07629/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Social norms -- the unspoken commonsense rules about acceptable social behavior -- are crucial in understanding the underlying causes and intents of people's actions in narratives. For example, underlying an action such as "wanting to call cops on my neighbors" are social norms that inform our conduct, such as "It is expected that you report crimes." We present Social Chemistry, a new conceptual formalism to study people's everyday social norms and moral judgments over a rich spectrum of real life situations described in natural language. We introduce Social-Chem-101, a large-scale corpus that catalogs 292k rules-of-thumb such as "it is rude to run a blender at 5am" as the basic conceptual units. Each rule-of-thumb is further broken down with 12 different dimensions of people's judgments, including social judgments of good and bad, moral foundations, expected cultural pressure, and assumed legality, which together amount to over 4.5 million annotations of categorical labels and free-text descriptions. Comprehensive empirical results based on state-of-the-art neural models demonstrate that computational modeling of social norms is a promising research direction. Our model framework, Neural Norm Transformer, learns and generalizes Social-Chem-101 to successfully reason about previously unseen situations, generating relevant (and potentially novel) attribute-aware social rules-of-thumb.