# Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationales

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12762 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12762/

## Key facts

- Cited by 160 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 160)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02301/) (2023)
- [Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00633/) (2023)
- [The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03401/) (2022)
- [Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11326/) (2022)
- [Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16755/) (2023)
- [Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12060/) (2021)
- [Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08674/) (2021)
- [Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06726/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09037/) (2025)
- [Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13950/) (2024)
- [Question Decomposition Improves the Faithfulness of Model-Generated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11768/) (2023)
- [Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18029/) (2023)
- [InstructRAG: Instructing Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Self-Synthesized Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13629/) (2024)
- [Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08678/) (2023)
- [Few-Shot Self-Rationalization with Natural Language Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08284/) (2021)
- [FLUTE: Figurative Language Understanding through Textual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12404/) (2022)
- [When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02201/) (2021)
- [PINTO: Faithful Language Reasoning Using Prompt-Generated Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01562/) (2022)
- [Training Language Models with Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14146/) (2022)
- [Beyond Answers: Transferring Reasoning Capabilities to Smaller LLMs Using Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04616/) (2024)
- [Prompting Contrastive Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06823/) (2021)
- [SelfExplain: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12279/) (2021)
- [Faithful Explanations of Black-box NLP Models Using LLM-generated Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00603/) (2023)
- [Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07095/) (2023)
- [Can Rationalization Improve Robustness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11790/) (2022)
- [Going Beyond XAI: A Systematic Survey for Explanation-Guided Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03954/) (2022)
- [Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17050/) (2023)
- [COBRA Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Effects and Harms of Offensive Statements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01985/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In interpretable NLP, we require faithful rationales that reflect the model's decision-making process for an explained instance. While prior work focuses on extractive rationales (a subset of the input words), we investigate their less-studied counterpart: free-text natural language rationales. We demonstrate that pipelines, existing models for faithful extractive rationalization on information-extraction style tasks, do not extend as reliably to "reasoning" tasks requiring free-text rationales. We turn to models that jointly predict and rationalize, a class of widely used high-performance models for free-text rationalization whose faithfulness is not yet established. We define label-rationale association as a necessary property for faithfulness: the internal mechanisms of the model producing the label and the rationale must be meaningfully correlated. We propose two measurements to test this property: robustness equivalence and feature importance agreement. We find that state-of-the-art T5-based joint models exhibit both properties for rationalizing commonsense question-answering and natural language inference, indicating their potential for producing faithful free-text rationales.