# Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Bandits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12642 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12642/

## Key facts

- Cited by 57 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 57)

- [Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10500/) (2024)
- [Improved Variance-Aware Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Linear Mixture MDP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.12745/) (2021)
- [Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01985/) (2022)
- [A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13977/) (2024)
- [Optimal Design for Reward Modeling in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17055/) (2024)
- [Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18554/) (2023)
- [Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06831/) (2024)
- [Dynamic pricing and assortment under a contextual MNL demand](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10018/) (2021)
- [Nearly Minimax Optimal Regret for Multinomial Logistic Bandit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09831/) (2024)
- [Lifting the Information Ratio: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13924/) (2022)
- [Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Update](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11847/) (2025)
- [Improved Online Confidence Bounds for Multinomial Logistic Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10020/) (2025)
- [Regret Bounds for Generalized Linear Bandits under Parameter Drift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.05750/) (2021)
- [Exploration via linearly perturbed loss minimisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07565/) (2023)
- [UCB-based Algorithms for Multinomial Logistic Regression Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11489/) (2021)
- [Reinforcement Learning with History-Dependent Dynamic Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02061/) (2023)
- [Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logit Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17061/) (2024)
- [Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10776/) (2024)
- [Linear bandits with polylogarithmic minimax regret](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12042/) (2024)
- [Switching the Loss Reduces the Cost in Batch (Offline) Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05385/) (2024)
- [Almost Free: Self-concordance in Natural Exponential Families and an Application to Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01112/) (2024)
- [An Experimental Design Approach for Regret Minimization in Logistic Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02407/) (2022)
- [Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logistic Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20165/) (2024)
- [Neural Logistic Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02069/) (2025)
- [Inference-Time Personalized Alignment with a Few User Preference Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02966/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Weighted Strategy for Non-stationary Parametric Bandits and MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01069/) (2026)
- [Provably Efficient Regularized Online RLHF with Generalized Bilinear Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23116/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning with a Terminator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15376/) (2022)
- [Generalized Kernelized Bandits: A Novel Self-Normalized Bernstein-Like Dimension-Free Inequality and Regret Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01681/) (2025)
- [Queue Length Regret Bounds for Contextual Queueing Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19300/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Logistic Bandits have recently attracted substantial attention, by providing an uncluttered yet challenging framework for understanding the impact of non-linearity in parametrized bandits. It was shown by Faury et al. (2020) that the learning-theoretic difficulties of Logistic Bandits can be embodied by a large (sometimes prohibitively) problem-dependent constant kappa, characterizing the magnitude of the reward's non-linearity. In this paper we introduce a novel algorithm for which we provide a refined analysis. This allows for a better characterization of the effect of non-linearity and yields improved problem-dependent guarantees. In most favorable cases this leads to a regret upper-bound scaling as tildeO(d√T/kappa), which dramatically improves over the tildeO(d√T+kappa) state-of-the-art guarantees. We prove that this rate is minimax-optimal by deriving a Omega(d√T/kappa) problem-dependent lower-bound. Our analysis identifies two regimes (permanent and transitory) of the regret, which ultimately re-conciliates Faury et al. (2020) with the Bayesian approach of Dong et al. (2019). In contrast to previous works, we find that in the permanent regime non-linearity can dramatically ease the exploration-exploitation trade-off. While it also impacts the length of the transitory phase in a problem-dependent fashion, we show that this impact is mild in most reasonable configurations.
