# Passive RIS vs.Hybrid RIS: A Comparative Study on Channel Estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06981 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06981/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Channel Estimation and Hybrid Architectures for RIS-Assisted Communications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07115/) (2021)
- [Beyond 5G RIS mmWave Systems: Where Communication and Localization Meet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07729/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) plays an important role in maintaining the connectivity in millimeter wave (mmWave) MIMO systems when the direct channel between the transceivers is blocked. However, it is difficult to acquire the channel state information (CSI), which is essential for the design of RIS phase control matrix and beamforming vectors at the transceivers. In this paper, we compare the channel estimation (CE) performance and achieved spectral efficiency (SE) of the purely passive and hybrid RIS architectures. CE is done via atomic norm minimization (ANM). For the purely passive RIS, we follow a two-stage procedure to sequentially estimate the channel parameters, while for the hybrid RIS we estimate the individual channels at the RIS based on the observations from active RIS elements assuming alternating uplink and downlink training. The simulation results show that the purely passive RIS brings better CE and SE performance compared to the hybrid RIS under the same training overhead. We further consider different setups for the hybrid RIS and study the tradeoffs among them.