# Explaining Clinical Decision Support Systems in Medical Imaging using Cycle-Consistent Activation Maximization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05759 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05759/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02398/) (2021)
- [Few-Shot Object Detection: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11699/) (2021)
- [Visualizing Global Explanations of Point Cloud DNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09505/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Activation Maximization and Generative Adversarial Training to Recognize and Explain Patterns in Natural Areas in Satellite Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08923/) (2023)
- [TIDE: Test Time Few Shot Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18358/) (2023)
- [Flow AM: Generating Point Cloud Global Explanations by Latent Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18760/) (2024)
- [Reconnoitering the class distinguishing abilities of the features, to know them better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12771/) (2022)
- [Enhancing Deep Learning Model Explainability in Brain Tumor Datasets using Post-Heuristic Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19568/) (2024)
- [Towards a Transparent and Interpretable AI Model for Medical Image Classifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16685/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical decision support using deep neural networks has become a topic of steadily growing interest. While recent work has repeatedly demonstrated that deep learning offers major advantages for medical image classification over traditional methods, clinicians are often hesitant to adopt the technology because its underlying decision-making process is considered to be intransparent and difficult to comprehend. In recent years, this has been addressed by a variety of approaches that have successfully contributed to providing deeper insight. Most notably, additive feature attribution methods are able to propagate decisions back into the input space by creating a saliency map which allows the practitioner to "see what the network sees." However, the quality of the generated maps can become poor and the images noisy if only limited data is available - a typical scenario in clinical contexts. We propose a novel decision explanation scheme based on CycleGAN activation maximization which generates high-quality visualizations of classifier decisions even in smaller data sets. We conducted a user study in which we evaluated our method on the LIDC dataset for lung lesion malignancy classification, the BreastMNIST dataset for ultrasound image breast cancer detection, as well as two subsets of the CIFAR-10 dataset for RBG image object recognition. Within this user study, our method clearly outperformed existing approaches on the medical imaging datasets and ranked second in the natural image setting. With our approach we make a significant contribution towards a better understanding of clinical decision support systems based on deep neural networks and thus aim to foster overall clinical acceptance.
