# Information-Theoretic Visual Explanation for Black-Box Classifiers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11150 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11150/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00786/) (2021)
- [Hard to Explain: On the Computational Hardness of In-Distribution Model Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03915/) (2024)
- [Perturbation-based Self-supervised Attention for Attention Bias in Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15684/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we attempt to explain the prediction of any black-box classifier from an information-theoretic perspective. For each input feature, we compare the classifier outputs with and without that feature using two information-theoretic metrics. Accordingly, we obtain two attribution maps--an information gain (IG) map and a point-wise mutual information (PMI) map. IG map provides a class-independent answer to "How informative is each pixel?", and PMI map offers a class-specific explanation of "How much does each pixel support a specific class?" Compared to existing methods, our method improves the correctness of the attribution maps in terms of a quantitative metric. We also provide a detailed analysis of an ImageNet classifier using the proposed method, and the code is available online.
