# A Selective Review of Negative Control Methods in Epidemiology

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05641 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05641/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Minimax Kernel Machine Learning for a Class of Doubly Robust Functionals with Application to Proximal Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02929/) (2021)
- [Validating Causal Inference Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04208/) (2022)
- [Reinforcement Learning from Partial Observation: Linear Function Approximation with Provable Sample Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.09787/) (2022)
- [Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01295/) (2024)
- [Partial Identification of Causal Effects Using Proxy Variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04374/) (2023)
- [Contrastive Balancing Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Dose-Response Curves Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14232/) (2024)
- [Optimal Treatment Regimes for Proximal Causal Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09494/) (2022)
- [Follow Your Nose -- Which Code Smells are Worth Chasing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01861/) (2021)
- [Spillover Detection for Donor Selection in Synthetic Control Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11399/) (2024)
- [Sanity Checks for Agentic Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11003/) (2026)
- [Synthetic Potential Outcomes and Causal Mixture Identifiability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19225/) (2024)
- [Causal Inference with Complex Treatments: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14022/) (2024)
- [Automating the Selection of Proxy Variables of Unmeasured Confounders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16130/) (2024)
- [Assessment of the conditional exchangeability assumption in causal machine learning models: a simulation study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26700/) (2025)
- [Which Alert Removals are Beneficial?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21322/) (2026)
- [Steering Vectors for Competing Ethical Frameworks Are Interchangeable: A Competing-Target Test for Activation Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19359/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose of Review: Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework. Recent Findings: We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double negative control design. Summary: There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.