# Simulation-Assisted Decorrelation for Resonant Anomaly Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02205 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02205/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02770/) (2021)
- [Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03769/) (2021)
- [Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08291/) (2021)
- [Bump Hunting in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06595/) (2021)
- [Challenges for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Particle Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06948/) (2021)
- [Online-compatible Unsupervised Non-resonant Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06417/) (2021)
- [Comparing Weak- and Unsupervised Methods for Resonant Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02092/) (2021)
- [Snowmass 2021 Computational Frontier CompF03 Topical Group Report: Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07559/) (2022)
- [CURTAINs Flows For Flows: Constructing Unobserved Regions with Maximum Likelihood Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04646/) (2023)
- [Resonant Anomaly Detection with Multiple Reference Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10579/) (2022)
- [Agents of Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08535/) (2025)
- [Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31103/) (2026)
- [TRANSIT your events into a new mass: Fast background interpolation for weakly-supervised anomaly searches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04342/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A growing number of weak- and unsupervised machine learning approaches to anomaly detection are being proposed to significantly extend the search program at the Large Hadron Collider and elsewhere. One of the prototypical examples for these methods is the search for resonant new physics, where a bump hunt can be performed in an invariant mass spectrum. A significant challenge to methods that rely entirely on data is that they are susceptible to sculpting artificial bumps from the dependence of the machine learning classifier on the invariant mass. We explore two solutions to this challenge by minimally incorporating simulation into the learning. In particular, we study the robustness of Simulation Assisted Likelihood-free Anomaly Detection (SALAD) to correlations between the classifier and the invariant mass. Next, we propose a new approach that only uses the simulation for decorrelation but the Classification without Labels (CWoLa) approach for achieving signal sensitivity. Both methods are compared using a full background fit analysis on simulated data from the LHC Olympics and are robust to correlations in the data.