# Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Process Mining: A General Overview and Application of a Novel Local Explanation Approach for Predictive Process Monitoring

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02098 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02098/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09973/) (2024)
- [Quantifying and Explaining Machine Learning Uncertainty in Predictive Process Monitoring: An Operations Research Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06412/) (2023)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Internet of Things: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04800/) (2022)
- [Agentic Business Process Management: A Research Manifesto](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18916/) (2026)
- [Building Interpretable Models for Business Process Prediction using Shared and Specialised Attention Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01419/) (2021)
- [Beyond Model Interpretability: Socio-Structural Explanations in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03632/) (2024)
- [Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16073/) (2022)
- [Predictive Compliance Monitoring in Process-Aware Information Systems: State of the Art, Functionalities, Research Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05446/) (2022)
- [Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Predictive Process Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17584/) (2023)
- [Process Mining for Unstructured Data: Challenges and Research Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13677/) (2023)
- [XABPs: Towards eXplainable Autonomous Business Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23269/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Event Prediction Methods from a Systems Perspective: Bringing Together Disparate Research Areas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04018/) (2023)
- [Communicating Uncertainty in Machine Learning Explanations: A Visualization Analytics Approach for Predictive Process Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05736/) (2023)
- [Time-Aware and Transition-Semantic Graph Neural Networks for Interpretable Predictive Business Process Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09527/) (2025)
- [Explain, Adapt and Retrain: How to improve the accuracy of a PPM classifier through different explanation styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14939/) (2023)
- [Identifying contributors to supply chain outcomes in a multi-echelon setting: a decentralised approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.12157/) (2023)
- [Revolutionizing Process Mining: A Novel Architecture for ChatGPT Integration and Enhanced User Experience through Optimized Prompt Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10689/) (2024)
- [Navigating Process Mining: A Case study using pm4py](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11294/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Taxonomy Similarity for Next Activity Prediction in Patient Treatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07638/) (2025)
- [Neuro-Symbolic Agents for Regulated Process Automation: Challenges and Research Agenda](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13405/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The contemporary process-aware information systems possess the capabilities to record the activities generated during the process execution. To leverage these process specific fine-granular data, process mining has recently emerged as a promising research discipline. As an important branch of process mining, predictive business process management, pursues the objective to generate forward-looking, predictive insights to shape business processes. In this study, we propose a conceptual framework sought to establish and promote understanding of decision-making environment, underlying business processes and nature of the user characteristics for developing explainable business process prediction solutions. Consequently, with regard to the theoretical and practical implications of the framework, this study proposes a novel local post-hoc explanation approach for a deep learning classifier that is expected to facilitate the domain experts in justifying the model decisions. In contrary to alternative popular perturbation-based local explanation approaches, this study defines the local regions from the validation dataset by using the intermediate latent space representations learned by the deep neural networks. To validate the applicability of the proposed explanation method, the real-life process log data delivered by the Volvo IT Belgium's incident management system are used.The adopted deep learning classifier achieves a good performance with the Area Under the ROC Curve of 0.94. The generated local explanations are also visualized and presented with relevant evaluation measures that are expected to increase the users' trust in the black-box-model.
