# The Pace of Artificial Intelligence Innovations: Speed, Talent, and Trial-and-Error

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01812 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01812/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Bursting Scientific Filter Bubbles: Boosting Innovation via Novel Author Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05669/) (2021)
- [China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11123/) (2023)
- [A Glimpse in ChatGPT Capabilities and its impact for AI research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06087/) (2023)
- [Has China caught up to the US in AI research? An exploration of mimetic isomorphism as a model for late industrializers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10198/) (2023)
- [Teaching Language Models to Forecast Research Success Through Comparative Idea Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21491/) (2026)
- [Predicting the clinical citation count of biomedical papers using multilayer perceptron neural network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06346/) (2022)
- [Evidence-Driven Decision Support for AI Model Selection in Research Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11984/) (2025)
- [PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11702/) (2026)
- [The Internet of Physical AI Agents: Interoperability, Longevity, and the Cost of Getting It Wrong](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15900/) (2026)
- [Internationalizing AI: Evolution and Impact of Distance Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01231/) (2021)
- [Generative AI in Heritage Practice: Improving the Accessibility of Heritage Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13811/) (2025)
- [Everything Counts: The Managed Omnirelevance of Speech in Human-Voice Agent Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22610/) (2025)
- [GitScholar: A Dataset for Predicting AI Research Impact from GitHub Engagement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26361/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are occurring at speeds faster than ever witnessed before. However, few studies have managed to measure or depict this increasing velocity of innovations in the field of AI. In this paper, we combine data on AI from arXiv and Semantic Scholar to explore the pace of AI innovations from three perspectives: AI publications, AI players, and AI updates (trial and error). A research framework and three novel indicators, Average Time Interval (ATI), Innovation Speed (IS) and Update Speed (US), are proposed to measure the pace of innovations in the field of AI. The results show that: (1) in 2019, more than 3 AI preprints were submitted to arXiv per hour, over 148 times faster than in 1994. Furthermore, there was one deep learning-related preprint submitted to arXiv every 0.87 hours in 2019, over 1,064 times faster than in 1994. (2) For AI players, 5.26 new researchers entered into the field of AI each hour in 2019, more than 175 times faster than in the 1990s. (3) As for AI updates (trial and error), one updated AI preprint was submitted to arXiv every 41 days, with around 33% of AI preprints having been updated at least twice in 2019. In addition, as reported in 2019, it took, on average, only around 0.2 year for AI preprints to receive their first citations, which is 5 times faster than 2000-2007. This swift pace in AI illustrates the increase in popularity of AI innovation. The systematic and fine-grained analysis of the AI field enabled to portrait the pace of AI innovation and demonstrated that the proposed approach can be adopted to understand other fast-growing fields such as cancer research and nano science.