# A Survey of Machine Learning Methods for Detecting False Data Injection Attacks in Power Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06926 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06926/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Joint Detection and Localization of Stealth False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids using Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.11846/) (2021)
- [False Data Injection Threats in Active Distribution Systems: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14251/) (2021)
- [Unifying Explainable Anomaly Detection and Root Cause Analysis in Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12086/) (2025)
- [Deep Learning for Intelligent Demand Response and Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08013/) (2021)
- [PowerFDNet: Deep Learning-Based Stealthy False Data Injection Attack Detection for AC-model Transmission Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10805/) (2022)
- [Expert enhanced dynamic time warping based anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02280/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Quantum Machine Learning for Power-System Attack Detection: Evaluation Choices Decide the Outcome Before the Models Do](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15617/) (2026)
- [Data-Optimized Contingency Screening: A Machine Learning Approach to Power System Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.04300/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Over the last decade, the number of cyberattacks targeting power systems and causing physical and economic damages has increased rapidly. Among them, False Data Injection Attacks (FDIAs) is a class of cyberattacks against power grid monitoring systems. Adversaries can successfully perform FDIAs in order to manipulate the power system State Estimation (SE) by compromising sensors or modifying system data. SE is an essential process performed by the Energy Management System (EMS) towards estimating unknown state variables based on system redundant measurements and network topology. SE routines include Bad Data Detection (BDD) algorithms to eliminate errors from the acquired measurements, e.g., in case of sensor failures. FDIAs can bypass BDD modules to inject malicious data vectors into a subset of measurements without being detected, and thus manipulate the results of the SE process. In order to overcome the limitations of traditional residual-based BDD approaches, data-driven solutions based on machine learning algorithms have been widely adopted for detecting malicious manipulation of sensor data due to their fast execution times and accurate results. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most up-to-date machine learning methods for detecting FDIAs against power system SE algorithms.
