# Coupling Machine Learning and Crop Modeling Improves Crop Yield Prediction in the US Corn Belt

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04060 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04060/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [MMST-ViT: Climate Change-aware Crop Yield Prediction via Multi-Modal Spatial-Temporal Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09067/) (2023)
- [A GNN-RNN Approach for Harnessing Geospatial and Temporal Information: Application to Crop Yield Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08900/) (2021)
- [Corn Yield Prediction with Ensemble CNN-DNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14351/) (2021)
- [Differentiable modeling to unify machine learning and physical models and advance Geosciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04027/) (2023)
- [A weakly supervised framework for high-resolution crop yield forecasts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09016/) (2022)
- [Corn Yield Prediction based on Remotely Sensed Variables Using Variational Autoencoder and Multiple Instance Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13286/) (2022)
- [From General to Specialized: The Need for Foundational Models in Agriculture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05390/) (2025)
- [Domain-guided Machine Learning for Remotely Sensed In-Season Crop Growth Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13323/) (2021)
- [Factors other than climate change are currently more important in predicting how well fruit farms are doing financially](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07685/) (2023)
- [Revolutionizing Global Food Security: Empowering Resilience through Integrated AI Foundation Models and Data-Driven Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20301/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning Meets Process-Based Models: A Hybrid Approach to Agricultural Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16141/) (2025)
- [Informed Learning for Estimating Drought Stress at Fine-Scale Resolution Enables Accurate Yield Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18648/) (2025)
- [FARM: Fine-Tuning Geospatial Foundation Models for Intra-Field Crop Yield Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26609/) (2025)
- [An Applied Deep Learning Approach for Estimating Soybean Relative Maturity from UAV Imagery to Aid Plant Breeding Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00952/) (2021)
- [Learning county from pixels: corn yield prediction with attention-weighted multiple instance learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01001/) (2023)
- [AgriPINN: A Process-Informed Neural Network for Interpretable and Scalable Crop Biomass Prediction Under Water Stress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16045/) (2026)
- [Evaluating and improving crop-yield forecasting methods during extreme drought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17971/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates whether coupling crop modeling and machine learning (ML) improves corn yield predictions in the US Corn Belt. The main objectives are to explore whether a hybrid approach (crop modeling + ML) would result in better predictions, investigate which combinations of hybrid models provide the most accurate predictions, and determine the features from the crop modeling that are most effective to be integrated with ML for corn yield prediction. Five ML models (linear regression, LASSO, LightGBM, random forest, and XGBoost) and six ensemble models have been designed to address the research question. The results suggest that adding simulation crop model variables (APSIM) as input features to ML models can decrease yield prediction root mean squared error (RMSE) from 7 to 20%. Furthermore, we investigated partial inclusion of APSIM features in the ML prediction models and we found soil moisture related APSIM variables are most influential on the ML predictions followed by crop-related and phenology-related variables. Finally, based on feature importance measure, it has been observed that simulated APSIM average drought stress and average water table depth during the growing season are the most important APSIM inputs to ML. This result indicates that weather information alone is not sufficient and ML models need more hydrological inputs to make improved yield predictions.