# Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04068 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04068/

## Key facts

- Cited by 101 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 101)

- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04359/) (2021)
- [Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10020/) (2022)
- [Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10328/) (2021)
- [The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15590/) (2021)
- [Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04719/) (2021)
- [Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09995/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05949/) (2023)
- [Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09824/) (2021)
- [Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05675/) (2021)
- [The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04844/) (2023)
- [AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11360/) (2024)
- [AI's Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Models in South Asia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11844/) (2023)
- [Characteristics of Harmful Text: Towards Rigorous Benchmarking of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08325/) (2022)
- [Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.03216/) (2022)
- [Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00799/) (2023)
- [Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01774/) (2021)
- [A Robot Walks into a Bar: Can Language Models Serve as Creativity Support Tools for Comedy? An Evaluation of LLMs' Humour Alignment with Comedians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20956/) (2024)
- [From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible ML](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03535/) (2022)
- [Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17555/) (2023)
- [Do Generative AI Models Output Harm while Representing Non-Western Cultures: Evidence from A Community-Centered Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14779/) (2024)
- [Reliability Testing for Natural Language Processing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02590/) (2021)
- [Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.04460/) (2022)
- [A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09253/) (2021)
- [Listening to Affected Communities to Define Extreme Speech: Dataset and Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11764/) (2022)
- [Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04256/) (2021)
- [A Material Lens on Coloniality in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08391/) (2023)
- [Holistic Safety and Responsibility Evaluations of Advanced AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14068/) (2024)
- [The 2024 Foundation Model Transparency Index](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12929/) (2024)
- [`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10221/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the important role of critical science, and in particular of post-colonial and decolonial theories, in understanding and shaping the ongoing advances in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is viewed as amongst the technological advances that will reshape modern societies and their relations. Whilst the design and deployment of systems that continually adapt holds the promise of far-reaching positive change, they simultaneously pose significant risks, especially to already vulnerable peoples. Values and power are central to this discussion. Decolonial theories use historical hindsight to explain patterns of power that shape our intellectual, political, economic, and social world. By embedding a decolonial critical approach within its technical practice, AI communities can develop foresight and tactics that can better align research and technology development with established ethical principles, centring vulnerable peoples who continue to bear the brunt of negative impacts of innovation and scientific progress. We highlight problematic applications that are instances of coloniality, and using a decolonial lens, submit three tactics that can form a decolonial field of artificial intelligence: creating a critical technical practice of AI, seeking reverse tutelage and reverse pedagogies, and the renewal of affective and political communities. The years ahead will usher in a wave of new scientific breakthroughs and technologies driven by AI research, making it incumbent upon AI communities to strengthen the social contract through ethical foresight and the multiplicity of intellectual perspectives available to us; ultimately supporting future technologies that enable greater well-being, with the goal of beneficence and justice for all.