# Relationship between manifold smoothness and adversarial vulnerability in deep learning with local errors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02047 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02047/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Eight challenges in developing theory of intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11232/) (2023)
- [Fermi-Bose Machine achieves both generalization and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13631/) (2024)
- [Autoencoders with Intrinsic Dimension Constraints for Learning Low Dimensional Image Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07686/) (2023)
- [SynthA1c: Towards Clinically Interpretable Patient Representations for Diabetes Risk Stratification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10043/) (2022)
- [Geometric origin of adversarial vulnerability in deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01235/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks can achieve impressive performances, and even outperform humans in some specific tasks. Nevertheless, unlike biological brains, the artificial neural networks suffer from tiny perturbations in sensory input, under various kinds of adversarial attacks. It is therefore necessary to study the origin of the adversarial vulnerability. Here, we establish a fundamental relationship between geometry of hidden representations (manifold perspective) and the generalization capability of the deep networks. For this purpose, we choose a deep neural network trained by local errors, and then analyze emergent properties of trained networks through the manifold dimensionality, manifold smoothness, and the generalization capability. To explore effects of adversarial examples, we consider independent Gaussian noise attacks and fast-gradient-sign-method (FGSM) attacks. Our study reveals that a high generalization accuracy requires a relatively fast power-law decay of the eigen-spectrum of hidden representations. Under Gaussian attacks, the relationship between generalization accuracy and power-law exponent is monotonic, while a non-monotonic behavior is observed for FGSM attacks. Our empirical study provides a route towards a final mechanistic interpretation of adversarial vulnerability under adversarial attacks.