# Learning Utilities and Equilibria in Non-Truthful Auctions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01722 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01722/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Box](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08586/) (2022)
- [Nash Convergence of Mean-Based Learning Algorithms in First-Price Auctions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03906/) (2021)
- [Improved Regret and Contextual Linear Extension for Pandora's Box and Prophet Inequality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18828/) (2025)
- [Are Equivariant Equilibrium Approximators Beneficial?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11481/) (2023)
- [How Does Independence Help Generalization? Sample Complexity of ERM on Product Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06422/) (2022)
- [Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regret](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04484/) (2025)
- [Functional Optimization Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Bidding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13939/) (2022)
- [Learning to Coordinate Bidders in Non-Truthful Auctions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02801/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In non-truthful auctions, agents' utility for a strategy depends on the strategies of the opponents and also the prior distribution over their private types; the set of Bayes Nash equilibria generally has an intricate dependence on the prior. Using the First Price Auction as our main demonstrating example, we show that tilde O(n / ε2) samples from the prior with n agents suffice for an algorithm to learn the interim utilities for all monotone bidding strategies. As a consequence, this number of samples suffice for learning all approximate equilibria. We give almost matching (up to polylog factors) lower bound on the sample complexity for learning utilities. We also consider a setting where agents must pay a search cost to discover their own types. Drawing on a connection between this setting and the first price auction, discovered recently by Kleinberg et al. (2016), we show that tilde O(n / ε2) samples suffice for utilities and equilibria to be estimated in a near welfare-optimal descending auction in this setting. En route, we improve the sample complexity bound, recently obtained by Guo et al. (2021), for the Pandora's Box problem, which is a classical model for sequential consumer search.
