# SAR Image Despeckling by Deep Neural Networks: from a pre-trained model to an end-to-end training strategy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15559 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15559/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [As if by magic: self-supervised training of deep despeckling networks with MERLIN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13148/) (2021)
- [Plug-and-Play image restoration with Stochastic deNOising REgularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01779/) (2024)
- [Generalized Recorrupted-to-Recorrupted: Self-Supervised Learning Beyond Gaussian Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04648/) (2024)
- [A speckle filter for Sentinel-1 SAR Ground Range Detected data based on Residual Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09350/) (2021)
- [Exploiting multi-temporal information for improved speckle reduction of Sentinel-1 SAR images by deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00682/) (2021)
- [Deep Learning Based Speckle Filtering for Polarimetric SAR Images. Application to Sentinel-1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15678/) (2024)
- [Self-Supervised Score-Based Despeckling for SAR Imagery via Log-Domain Transformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14334/) (2026)
- [GSNR: Graph Smooth Null-Space Representation for Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20328/) (2026)
- [A Deep Learning Iterative Framework for Sentinel-1 Stripmap Enhancement Based on Azimuth Doppler Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29088/) (2026)
- [Minimax Theory of Likelihood-Based Deep Learning for Speckle Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14064/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Speckle reduction is a longstanding topic in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. Many different schemes have been proposed for the restoration of intensity SAR images. Among the different possible approaches, methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently shown to reach state-of-the-art performance for SAR image restoration. CNN training requires good training data: many pairs of speckle-free / speckle-corrupted images. This is an issue in SAR applications, given the inherent scarcity of speckle-free images. To handle this problem, this paper analyzes different strategies one can adopt, depending on the speckle removal task one wishes to perform and the availability of multitemporal stacks of SAR data. The first strategy applies a CNN model, trained to remove additive white Gaussian noise from natural images, to a recently proposed SAR speckle removal framework: MuLoG (MUlti-channel LOgarithm with Gaussian denoising). No training on SAR images is performed, the network is readily applied to speckle reduction tasks. The second strategy considers a novel approach to construct a reliable dataset of speckle-free SAR images necessary to train a CNN model. Finally, a hybrid approach is also analyzed: the CNN used to remove additive white Gaussian noise is trained on speckle-free SAR images. The proposed methods are compared to other state-of-the-art speckle removal filters, to evaluate the quality of denoising and to discuss the pros and cons of the different strategies. Along with the paper, we make available the weights of the trained network to allow its usage by other researchers.
