# Towards Better Performance and More Explainable Uncertainty for 3D Object Detection of Autonomous Vehicles

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12015 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12015/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Uncertainty for Identifying Open-Set Errors in Visual Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.01328/) (2021)
- [Keypoint-Based Category-Level Object Pose Tracking from an RGB Sequence with Uncertainty Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11047/) (2022)
- [Generating Evidential BEV Maps in Continuous Driving Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02928/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty aware and explainable diagnosis of retinal disease](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.12041/) (2021)
- [Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07825/) (2022)
- [Safety Implications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12176/) (2024)
- [Not Every Side Is Equal: Localization Uncertainty Estimation for Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10390/) (2023)
- [Advancing Explainable Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Comprehensive Review and Research Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00019/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Lidar Place Recognition in Novel Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01361/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a novel form of the loss function to increase the performance of LiDAR-based 3d object detection and obtain more explainable and convincing uncertainty for the prediction. The loss function was designed using corner transformation and uncertainty modeling. With the new loss function, the performance of our method on the val split of KITTI dataset shows up to a 15% increase in terms of Average Precision (AP) comparing with the baseline using simple L1 Loss. In the study of the characteristics of predicted uncertainties, we find that generally more accurate prediction of the bounding box is usually accompanied by lower uncertainty. The distribution of corner uncertainties agrees on the distribution of the point cloud in the bounding box, which means the corner with denser observed points has lower uncertainty. Moreover, our method also learns the constraint from the cuboid geometry of the bounding box in uncertainty prediction. Finally, we propose an efficient Bayesian updating method to recover the uncertainty for the original parameters of the bounding boxes which can help to provide probabilistic results for the planning module.
