# Iteration-complexity of an inexact proximal accelerated augmented Lagrangian method for solving linearly constrained smooth nonconvex composite optimization problems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08048 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08048/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Stochastic Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Method for Nonconvex Expectation Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09513/) (2022)
- [A Single-Loop Gradient Descent and Perturbed Ascent Algorithm for Nonconvex Functional Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05650/) (2022)
- [Oracle Complexity of Single-Loop Switching Subgradient Methods for Non-Smooth Weakly Convex Functional Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13314/) (2023)
- [Damped Proximal Augmented Lagrangian Method for weakly-Convex Problems with Convex Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09065/) (2023)
- [Inexact Moreau Envelope Lagrangian Method for Non-Convex Constrained Optimization under Local Error Bound Conditions on Constraint Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19764/) (2025)
- [First-order Methods for Affinely Constrained Composite Non-convex Non-smooth Problems: Lower Complexity Bound and Near-optimal Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07605/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes and establishes the iteration-complexity of an inexact proximal accelerated augmented Lagrangian (IPAAL) method for solving linearly constrained smooth nonconvex composite optimization problems. Each IPAAL iteration consists of inexactly solving a proximal augmented Lagrangian subproblem by an accelerated composite gradient (ACG) method followed by a suitable Lagrange multiplier update. It is shown that IPAAL generates an approximate stationary solution in at most cal O(log(1/ρ)/ρ3) ACG iterations, where ρ>0 is the given tolerance. It is also shown that the previous complexity bound can be sharpened to cal O(log(1/ρ)/ρ2.5) under additional mildly stronger assumptions. The above bounds are derived assuming that the initial point is neither feasible nor the domain of the composite term of the objective function is bounded. Some preliminary numerical results are presented to illustrate the performance of the IPAAL method.