# Principal Fairness for Human and Algorithmic Decision-Making

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10400 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10400/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 May 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Causal Conceptions of Fairness and their Consequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05302/) (2022)
- [Auditing the Use of Language Models to Guide Hiring Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03086/) (2024)
- [What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04101/) (2022)
- [Safe Policy Learning through Extrapolation: Application to Pre-trial Risk Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11679/) (2021)
- [Policy Learning with Asymmetric Counterfactual Utilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10479/) (2022)
- [Causal Fairness for Outcome Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05066/) (2023)
- [Tier Balancing: Towards Dynamic Fairness over Underlying Causal Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08987/) (2023)
- [Causal Fairness Assessment of Treatment Allocation with Electronic Health Records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11183/) (2022)
- [Procedural Fairness Through Decoupling Objectionable Data Generating Components](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14688/) (2023)
- [A Review of Fairness and A Practical Guide to Selecting Context-Appropriate Fairness Metrics in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06624/) (2024)
- [Designing Equitable Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09157/) (2023)
- [Statistical Decision Theory with Counterfactual Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08908/) (2025)
- [Path-specific effects for pulse-oximetry guided decisions in critical care](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12371/) (2025)
- [Fairness Through Counterfactual Utilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05315/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Fairness-Adaptive Classification Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05810/) (2024)
- [Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01625/) (2024)
- [Learning Counterfactual Outcomes Under Rank Preservation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06398/) (2025)
- [Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08337/) (2025)
- [Masking Causality and Conditional Dependence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06984/) (2026)
- [Path-specific harm decomposition: A partial identification framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29938/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Using the concept of principal stratification from the causal inference literature, we introduce a new notion of fairness, called principal fairness, for human and algorithmic decision-making. The key idea is that one should not discriminate among individuals who would be similarly affected by the decision. Unlike the existing statistical definitions of fairness, principal fairness explicitly accounts for the fact that individuals can be impacted by the decision. Furthermore, we explain how principal fairness differs from the existing causality-based fairness criteria. In contrast to the counterfactual fairness criteria, for example, principal fairness considers the effects of decision in question rather than those of protected attributes of interest. We briefly discuss how to approach empirical evaluation and policy learning problems under the proposed principal fairness criterion.
