# Learning Rate Annealing Can Provably Help Generalization, Even for Convex Problems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07360 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07360/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 May 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05337/) (2022)
- [On the Maximum Hessian Eigenvalue and Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10654/) (2022)
- [Learning threshold neurons via the "edge of stability"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07469/) (2022)
- [Large Learning Rate Tames Homogeneity: Convergence and Balancing Effect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03677/) (2021)
- [Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06506/) (2022)
- [Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09931/) (2022)
- [Learning Associative Memories with Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18724/) (2024)
- [How to decay your learning rate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12682/) (2021)
- [On the Benefits of Large Learning Rates for Kernel Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13733/) (2022)
- [Unifying Global and Local Scene Entities Modelling for Precise Action Spotting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09951/) (2024)
- [What Neuroscience Can Teach AI About Learning in Continuously Changing Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02103/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Learning rate schedule can significantly affect generalization performance in modern neural networks, but the reasons for this are not yet understood. Li-Wei-Ma (2019) recently proved this behavior can exist in a simplified non-convex neural-network setting. In this note, we show that this phenomenon can exist even for convex learning problems -- in particular, linear regression in 2 dimensions. We give a toy convex problem where learning rate annealing (large initial learning rate, followed by small learning rate) can lead gradient descent to minima with provably better generalization than using a small learning rate throughout. In our case, this occurs due to a combination of the mismatch between the test and train loss landscapes, and early-stopping.
