# Knowing what you know: valid and validated confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10181 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10181/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08279/) (2021)
- [Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03323/) (2021)
- [Consistent Accelerated Inference via Confident Adaptive Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08803/) (2021)
- [Training Uncertainty-Aware Classifiers with Conformalized Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05878/) (2022)
- [Few-shot Conformal Prediction with Auxiliary Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08898/) (2021)
- [Conformalized Survival Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09763/) (2021)
- [High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17651/) (2023)
- [Efficient and Differentiable Conformal Prediction with General Function Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11091/) (2022)
- [Post-selection Inference for Conformal Prediction: Trading off Coverage for Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06158/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We develop conformal prediction methods for constructing valid predictive confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel problems without assumptions on the data generating distribution. A challenge here is that typical conformal prediction methods---which give marginal validity (coverage) guarantees---provide uneven coverage, in that they address easy examples at the expense of essentially ignoring difficult examples. By leveraging ideas from quantile regression, we build methods that always guarantee correct coverage but additionally provide (asymptotically optimal) conditional coverage for both multiclass and multilabel prediction problems. To address the potential challenge of exponentially large confidence sets in multilabel prediction, we build tree-structured classifiers that efficiently account for interactions between labels. Our methods can be bolted on top of any classification model---neural network, random forest, boosted tree---to guarantee its validity. We also provide an empirical evaluation, simultaneously providing new validation methods, that suggests the more robust coverage of our confidence sets.
